What a blow for the former member of the Golden Generation

What a blow for Tibor Selymes, the former member of the “Golden Generation”: the final decision came from the Court of Appeal in the corruption case!

The former footballer was accused of covering up a traffic accident, along with his wife and five policemen!

What a blow for the former member of the Golden Generation

Finally, the final decision came, and the Târgu Mureș Court of Appeal finally acquitted him Tibor Selymes. Several years ago, the former footballer allegedly got behind the wheel under the influence of alcohol and caused an accident, and the police were accused of favoring him to get away easily.

The file had already started in 2017, when DNA Brașov sued Selymes, his wife and the policemen in question, and now the final decision has come.

“Rejects the request for reinstatement of the case, formulated by DNA – Territorial Service Tg. Mures.

Pursuant to art. 421 point 2 letter a Criminal Procedure Code admits the appeals declared by the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the ÎCCJ – DNA Territorial Service Braşov, the defendants ……… against the criminal sentence no. 175/S of September 6, 2022, pronounced by the Braşov Court in file no. 2813/68/2018 and consequently:

Based on art. 423 para. 1 Criminal Procedure Code partially annuls the appealed judgment and rejudging the case disposes within the limits below: 1. Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. b) sentence I of the Code of Criminal Procedure acquits the defendant TC for committing the crime of inciting abuse of office if the civil servant obtained for himself or for another an improper benefit in a continuous form, prev. of art. 47 Criminal Code rap. to art. 132 of Law no. 78/2000 rap. to art. 297 para. 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 35 para. 1 Criminal Code – 4 material documents.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. a Code of criminal procedure acquits the defendant TC for committing the crime of favoring the perpetrator, prev. of art. 269 ​​para. 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 46 para. 2 Criminal Code 2.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. b) sentence I of the Code of Criminal Procedure acquits the accused OI for committing the crime of complicity in abuse of office if the civil servant obtained for himself or for another an improper benefit in a continuous form, prev. of art. 48 Criminal Code rap. to art. 132 of Law no. 78/2000; and art. 297 para. 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 35 para. 1 Criminal Code – 3 material documents.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. a Code of criminal procedure acquits the defendant OI for committing the crime of favoring the perpetrator, prev. of art. 269 ​​para. 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 46 para. 2 Criminal Code. 3.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. b) sentence I of the Code of Criminal Procedure acquits the defendant CMV for committing the crime of abuse of office if the civil servant obtained an undue benefit for himself or for another, provision of art. 132 of Law no. 78/2000 rap. to art. 297 para. 1 Criminal Code.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. a Criminal Procedure Code acquits the defendant CMV for committing the crime of favoring the perpetrator, prev. of art. 269 ​​para. 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 46 para. 2 Criminal Code. 4.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. b) sentence I of the Code of Criminal Procedure acquits the defendant SCL for committing the crime of abuse of office if the civil servant obtained an undue benefit for himself or for another, prev. of art. 132 of Law no. 78/2000 rap. to art. 297 para. 1 Criminal Code. Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. a Criminal Procedure Code acquits the defendant SCL for committing the crime of favoring the perpetrator, prev. of art. 269 ​​para. 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 46 para. 2 Criminal Code. 5. Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. b) sentence I Criminal Procedure Code acquits the defendant GIG for committing the crime of abuse of office if the civil servant obtained an undue benefit for himself or for another, prev. of art. 132 of Law no. 78/2000 rap. to art. 297 para. 1 Criminal Code.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. a Criminal Procedure Code acquits the defendant GIG for committing the crime of favoring the perpetrator, prev. of art. 269 ​​para. 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 46 para. 2 Criminal Code. 6.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. b) sentence I of the Code of Criminal Procedure acquits the defendant SD for committing the crime of complicity in abuse of office if the civil servant obtained for himself or for another an improper benefit in continued form prev. of art. 48 Criminal Code rap. to art. 132 of Law no. 78/2000 and art. 297 paragraph 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 35 paragraph 1 Criminal Code – 3 material documents. 7.

Pursuant to art. based on art. 396 para. 5 Code of criminal procedure rap to art. 16 para. 1 lit. b) sentence I of the Code of Criminal Procedure acquits the defendant ST for committing the crime of complicity in abuse of office if the civil servant obtained for himself or for another an improper benefit in a continuous form prev. of art. 48 Criminal Code rap. to art. 132 of Law no. 78/2000 and art. 297 paragraph 1 Criminal Code, with the application of art. 35 para. 1 Criminal Code – 3 material documents.

It states that by criminal decision no. 159/AP pronounced by the Braşov Court of Appeal on March 2, 2023 in criminal file no. 2813/62/2018 was rejected as unfounded the appeal declared by the civilly responsible party Societatea de Asigurare Uniqua Asigurări SĂ against criminal sentence no. 175/S of September 6, 2022, pronounced by the Braşov Court in file no. 2813/68/2018 and the appeals filed by the Prosecutor’s Office attached to the ÎCCJ – DNA Territorial Service Braşov, defendants TC, OI, CMV, SCL and GI Gi., appeals regarding the crimes of abuse of office and favoring the perpetrator, were dismissed. It maintains all the other provisions of the contested decision that do not contradict the presence.

Based on art. 275 para. 3 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the legal expenses advanced by the state in the procedure for resolving this appeal remain the responsibility of the state. Based on art. 275 para. 6 Criminal Procedure Code, the value of the fees of the lawyers appointed ex officio in favor of the defendants OI, SD (partial fee of 1,000 lei) and ST (partial fee of 1,000 lei) remains the responsibility of the state and is advanced from the special fund of the Ministry of Justice, in favor of the Mureş Bar Association . Definitive. Pronounced by making the solution available to the defendants, the parties and the prosecutor, through the intercession of the registry office, today March 28, 2024″, it is stated in Decision 156/2024 of March 28, 2024.