ReturoSGR is clinically dead

In Romania, the Guarantee and Return System (SGR), known as ReturoSGR, was launched with high hopes, but is quickly turning into a burden for consumers and local producers. Recent data shows that this system is far from effective, and major problems place it in a state of disaster.

ReturoSGR has become a symbol of disappointment and frustration for many Romanians, who constantly invest in products with recyclable packaging, only to find that they can never recoup their investment. This feeling of being cheated and cheated is fueled by the lack of an efficient collection and recycling system that prioritizes the benefit of consumers and the environment over the financial interests of those who manage ReturoSGR. More and more people are questioning whether it is worth continuing to support these practices, given that they never get back what they have invested.

For example, I can tell you my personal experience: for more than a month, I have been carrying around a bag full of dozens of bottles, with the hope that one day I will come across a working recycling machine. However, hope dies last, and I encounter the same uncertainty regarding the RETURO program.

With a return rate below 1%, ReturoSGR has become synonymous with failure. Plastic, metal and glass packaging is returned in tiny proportions, and this only adds to the frustrations and costs for everyone involved.

The main culprit is RetuRO, the company that manages the system, accused of only pursuing profit at the expense of the interests of the community and the environment. Moreover, the collection infrastructure is underdeveloped and the initial promises are far from fulfilled.

These issues have a devastating impact on local producers, who have to bear substantial costs to comply with the ReturoSGR system. From huge warranties to changing labels, these expenses directly affect the profitability and operation of these companies.

In addition, consumers are also affected, especially those in rural areas, where small shops have to bear additional costs. This financial burden, which is not always fully recovered, leads traders to look for solutions to cope with these financial pressures.

However, solutions and dialogue between the parties involved are completely lacking. In the absence of significant reforms and a cooperative approach between all actors, ReturoSGR risks becoming an unbearable burden for the Romanian economy and society.

In conclusion, the failure of the ReturoSGR system is obvious, and the need for urgent action is imperative to avoid even more serious consequences for the business environment and consumers in Romania.