Exclusive Video | At the penalty shot by Rrahmani, 6 CFR players were in the box. Marius Avram said what qualification Marian Barbu would deserve

article written by Digi Sport
06.05.2024, 10:42

• SuperLiga: Hermannstadt – Poli IasiMonday, 15:00, DGS 1

• SuperLiga: Craiova University – FCSBMonday, 21:00, DGS 1

When did you 7 defeats FROM 8 matches and you’re the weakest team depending on the points won after the regular season, it’s hard for you Rapid to talk about arbitration.

It is clear that the first problem of Giulești is with the coaches and the players, but it must also be said that the team is faced with the situation where almost every match the borderline decisions are taken against them. It seems that he is no longer in the good graces of the Central Referees Committee delegates, as he seemed to be in the first part of the season.

6 players from CFR and one from Rapid were in the box at Rrahmani’s execution, from 11 meters

Including the match in Cluj, with CFR, score 2-3, there were several phases in which the people of Giulio can complain about Marian Barbu’s refereeing. The “Central” allowed the intimidation game proposed by some of the hosts’ players, among which Keita and Muhar stood out.

One of the phases in which Marian Barbu ignored the regulation was the one in the 72nd minute, at the penalty dictated by the intervention of Iulian Dima from the VAR Chamber, after the handball made by Boben, to which neither the central nor the “assistant” Vasile Marinescu reacted .

At the moment Rrahmani was on the point of execution, in which no less than six CFR players and one from Rapid had entered. In fact, a seventh one was also in an irregular position, because it had entered the “cap”, as the half-sky drawn at the border of the large square is called.

All in Marian Barbu’s field of vision. This time, the VAR in which Dima and Stelian Slabu (AVAR) were also did not intervene.

According to Marius Avram, referee Marian Barbu deserves a suspension after CFR – Rapid, score 3-2

At the end, present on the set of the Digi Sport Special show, the former international referee Marius Avram said that based on the way the observers mark the referees, Barbu could receive a qualification below 7.9, which would mean the retention from the delegations.

Asked by filmmaker Vali Moraru what grade Barbu would receive, the former international referee was clear: “If I deduct those yellow cards he didn’t give, there were several phases where he left some tackles a bit over the limit, usually according to the instructions, the observers deduct 0.1 for each yellow card wrongly awarded and everything starts from grade 8.4.

There’s no 10. There’s 8.4 and if you’re wrong, 8.3, 8.2, 8.1. I would have given an 8.2 to Marian Barbu. And if I subtract 0.5 for this penalty that I didn’t see, the next stage is already at home.

It already goes to 7.7, and from 7.9 it is considered a failing grade. Not always. It also depends on the phases. For example, a phase that the referee had no way of seeing, is deducted 0.5 from the mark if the VAR helps him, but is not sanctioned with a suspension.

A phase that he could or should have seen, there, even if the VAR helps him, there it is analyzed a little differently by those in the Central Commission of Referees. Here he is very far out of phase, he also catches him a bit perpendicular, hard to see, but he could solve it if he respected the diagonal“, explained Avram.

Video with Marius Avram’s analysis related to referee Marian Barbu’s performance at CFR – Rapid 3-2

Video with the summary of the match CFR – Rapid 3-2

Labels:
marius avram
,
marian beard
,
quick cfr video 3-2
,
rrahmani penalty

Follow digisport.ro news and on Google News

The new Digi Sport Application can be downloaded from